HOLY FREE ART PROGRAMS BATMAN

smollux:

giovannuzza:

I’ve had this list sitting around for a while (in case I ever want to try something new) and I thought I’d share it, because why the hell not, everybody loves free stuff. I’ve only used a couple, so for all I know these could be complete shit. BUT YOU NEVER KNOW, RIGHT?

*= available for both windows and mac os

GIMP * – Does a lot of the same stuff as Photoshop.

FireAlpaca * – Similar to Paint Tool Sai, so it’s a good alternative for Mac users.

Autodesk Sketchbook Copic Edition * – Simulates the look of copic markers.

MyPaint * – Basic stuff, nothing fancy.

Pinta * – Drawing program modeled after paint.NET.

Inkscape * – Vector/drawing program meant to be similar to Illustrator.

ArtRage * – Digital painting program; you can get the trimmed down version for free or buy the full version with more features.

Sumo Paint * – In-browser drawing app.

DAZ Studio * – Some sort of 3D model poser thing.

Pencil * – Software for animating.

SketchUp * – Tool for making 3D models. Looks handy for stuff like architectural drawings.

Blender * – Pretty popular 3D software.

escape motions * – Some browser apps, fun to fiddle with when you’re bored (the fluid fire simulation is pretty cool imo).

Twistedbrush (Pixarra) – Seems to be meant for replicating the look of traditional media.

Pixia/Phierha – A popular program in Japan, according to the website.

Krita – This was originally made for Linux and it looks like the developers haven’t ironed out all of the kinks in the Windows installer.

Artweaver – Another trimmed down free thing if you don’t want to buy the full program.

paint.NET – Pretty basic kit, probably good for simple stuff.

Project Dogwaffle – I’m not sure what this one is all about because I couldn’t stop laughing at the terrible website.

Speedy Painter – Lightweight digital painting program.

mtPaint – Originally made for pixel art; simple enough to run on older computers.

Chasys Draw IES – Supposed to be some sort of drawing+image editor thing.

PaintRibbon – Seems to be another plain old basic image editor.

DrawPlus – Looks like it’s made for graphic design and vector stuff.

SmoothDraw – I’m guessing this is a basic thing for people who don’t want to bother with complicated stuff.

!!!!!

Writing Research – Bow & Arrows

ghostflowerdreams:

How To Make A Bow and Arrows

How To Use A Bow

How To Treat An Arrow Wound/Injury

theharemuses:

keyaroscuro:

sixthrock:

lavastormsw:

bolinsboo:

razzledazzy:

The photo above is the closest humanity has ever come to creating Medusa. 

If you were to look at this, you would die instantly. End of story.

The image is of a reactor core lava formation in the basement of the Chernobyl nuclear plant. It’s called the Elephant’s Foot and weighs hundreds of tons, but is only a couple meters across.

Oh, and regarding the Medusa thing? This picture was taken through a mirror around the corner of the hallway. Because the wheeled camera they sent up to take pictures of it was destroyed by the radiation

I wonder if they could get pictures in colour now or maybe get an accurate heat reading off of that thing, if it’s still all there.

It’s crazy to think that something can be that strong that it would kill you by just looking at it. Though it’s understandable. I’d like a heat reading off of it.

Oh my god

I have such a science boner right now

Do you know how fucking dense that must be to weigh hundreds of tons?

Pretty fucking dense.

Wow.

I found this video for anyone who wants to see a video of the thing (although it’s not the best quality). This thing is a serious monster. I have a little trouble deciphering this Wikipedia article, but from what I gather, this thing weighs 1,200 tons (2,400,000 pounds – a number I cannot even begin to fathom) and is only losing about 22 pounds of uranium per year. It resists its environment and if the shelter is improved, that loss is expected to drop.

Holy shit.

I am simply astounded by the sheer power and properties of radiation and nuclear power plants. This is seriously scary stuff. Not to mention its effects on humans. i find deformed humans very, very unnerving. The mutations that radiation cause are the worst, in my opinion, than say, genetic mutations. This video shows some of the mutations from the Chernobyl meltdown (warning: these are very disturbing images, so view at your own risk).

Here’s another website with a collection of Chernobyl pictures, mostly of the building itself (no mutation pictures, so unless you’re upset by major destruction, this is a really cool look-through). This is my favorite picture because it really shows the dripping of the radioactive fuel/debris lava out of the valve. I just find it so absolutely terrifying that something like this could ever happen. Radiation is seriously scary stuff. What I want to know is how they took that picture.

Oh holy shit this is terrifying. The color just makes it worse. It’s like a volcano erupted indoors. Which is probably a pretty accurate analogy, plus tons of radiation to go with it. “”Corium” is only formed during a reactor meltdown as a product of the solid fuel fissioning uncontrollably. This super-hot fuel turns into a liquid and melts its way through steel, concrete, and whatever else that might be in contact with it. So it’s a mixture of fuel and various building materials,” the admin says in the comments.

This article says that Chernobyl will stay radioactive for 100,000 years.

Radiation is just unfathomably scary stuff.

Daaaaamn.

All of this is just so incredibly terrifying and amazing at the same time. Just to think of the things humans are capable of now, and all the various horrible ways everything could go very very wrong if we’re too careless for just a second…

okay yeah fine I didn’t need to sleep tonight anyway ;_;

The Chernobyl disaster is one of the saddest and scariest things we humans have ever done to ourselves and the planet. 

100,000 years is a very, very long time.

Also, fun tidbit: there are approximately104 nuclear reactors in the United States alone. True, we have higher standards now, but all it takes is one natural disaster like the Japan 2011 earthquake and tsunami or one Three Mile Island accident to set one of those things off. 

#but also because I showed HC #and I can hear her typing like a mad woman #Health Physics Student Ahoy! #You have been warned

Where… where do I even begin with this?  Oh Dr. Turner, what would you say to this? Besides…  

Okay.  First off.  Elephant’s Foot.  Cool stuff there.  The student of radiation physics and protection inside me is beside herself with science-related glee.  That is some effing amazing science shit.  Science-induced coma here, people.

Read the article though.  The Elephant’s Foot weighs 2 metric tons (or 2000 kilograms or ~4400 pounds) and it composed of “black lava”, or a mixture of concrete, debris, and radioactive material.  (The 1200 tons is in reference to all of the slag created in the accident, not the Elephant’s Foot specifically.)

It is true that electronics are sensitive to radiation – cameras and other sophisticated electronics have to be replaced fairly regularly in areas of high radiation – but then again electronics are sensitive to both ionizing and non-ionizing radiation.  They are affected for the same reason you don’t leave your camera in direct sunlight, or the oven, or run it through a microwave (which are all forms of non-ionizing radiation, btw), it’s an environmental factor the device is not designed to handle.  

The camera in this case was “destroyed” by radiation, yes… heat is a form of radiation and the slag from the reactor core was 1660 °C for 4 days, at least.  That kind of heat would destroy anything.  So while a form of radiation was responsible for the danger posed by the slag, it wasn’t actually the ionizing radiation that was the main factor to using mirrors and remote cameras to get photos.  It was the heat first, radiation second, because that kind of heat would melt most things – in fact 1600 °C is the high end melting point of glass (Iron’s is 1535 °C; titanium, 1660 °C, so pushing it.  Platinum wouldn’t melt. It’s melting point is 1772 °C).  Why anyone would think that the radiation level (though high) would be the first issue here is beyond me.

But guys.  There is something that you ALL need to understand and for some of you, it may be incredibly surprising…

Ionizing radiation – alpha, beta, gamma, neutron – is ALL around you.  Sat/stood/slept next to another person?  Been outside recently?  Stood in the sun?  Eaten a banana?  Lived in the universe?  Guess what?  You’ve been exposed to ionizing radiation.  It comes from the environment, from man-made sources like x-ray machines, and from space.  All of you, simply from living on planet Earth will be exposed to approximately 400 millirem, or 4 mSv, of radiation over the course of a year.  Sounds like a lot, sure.  400 millirem/year.  Unless you compare to the industry standard annual limit for radiation workers – 5000 millirem/year (50 mSv/yr).

Chernobyl was a horrible and terrifying accident.  I will never deny that.  It was poorly handled.  It was poorly contained.  Most importantly, the reactors at the Chernobyl site were not built correctly.  It was not being operated within proper safety protocols.  

The accident occurred for a number of reasons: a process called reactor poisoning began when a neutron absorber caused the reactor to drop from 700 MW to 500 MW and then the control rods were inserted too far placing the reactor in a near shut down state (~30MW).  Despite the fact that the reactor was producing less than 5% of the power needed for the test that was being ran, the operators continued with the test which caused a positive feedback loop for steam production reducing the amount of liquid water persent in the system to absorb radiation…

Are you starting to see why the Chernobyl incident happened?

  • …When the first explosion, inevitably, occurred, the core was overheating, power output went from near shutdown to 530 MW in three seconds, and all of the coolant for the system flashed to steam… 
  • causing more over heating because steam is what is used to generate electricity in a reactor not to cool anything.  This fed into the positive feedback loop causing the reactor core to heat even more and go into meltdown… mainly because there was nothing to cool it.
  • Because graphite (of all the bloody choices in the world) was used in the system as a neutron moderator, the system caught fire inside of the core housing.  
  • This, in turn, caused the core to burn so hot that the building  itself caught on fire because bitumen, a highly combustible material, was used in the construction of the roof contrary to safety regulations.
  • The graphite fire within the system was left to burn for weeks without any attempt to put it out.
  • People in adjacent buildings were given respirators and told to keep working until they finally ignored orders and left.
  • Firefighters sent in to put out the bitumen covered buildings weren’t even told why they could only work for a few minutes before they had to leave.  
  • Workers were exposed to a lifetime dose of radiation within minutes.
  • 64 people died as a direct result of the accident.  4000 cancer related deaths have been linked back to exposure caused by the accident.

Chernobyl occurred because there were idiots in charge who didn’t want to acknowledge just how much they fucked up.  It was a mess and all safety protocols, or even logical reason, was ignored by most of the people in charge endangering the lives of thousands as a result.

So that’s why the Chernobyl incident occurred.  Here’s a few reasons why it won’t again:

  • First off, the RBMK reactor models built at Chernobyl were never built outside of the USSR.
  • Graphite is not used as an moderating agent outside of those models.
  • Bitumen would never be used in the building of reactor housing. (what the HELL they were thinking is beyond me.)
  • The IAEA, NRC, DoE, and the dozens of other regulatory and policy making organizations closely monitor and maintain standards that are far superior to those at Chernobyl
  • Unlike most industries (coal, oil, etc), the nuclear industry learns from its mistakes and does everything within their power to prevent it from happening again.  TMI was absolutely nothing compared to Chernobyl.  Fukushima as well, even considering that they both rate as “Major Accidents”.

Radiation is something that is powerful, yes.  It needs to be used and treated with respect and care, yes.

It is not something to blindly feared.

image

Not every reactor is Chernobyl, or even TMI or Fukushima, waiting to happen.  They are not ticking time bombs despite whatever Hollywood or the media claims.  A nuclear reactor core does not equal atom bomb (I’m looking at and judging you, TDKR).  You need weapons-grade material to make weapons.  Nuclear fuel cells do not use weapons-grade material.  Ergo, nuclear fuel is not a nuclear weapon.  Furthermore, those three instances were caused by one of two things, unique extenuating circumstances (9pt earthquake plus tsunami) or complete human idiocy (running a reactor outside of safe operation limits).

Nuclear power is under such a constant scrutiny that they can’t be screw-ups.  The nuclear industry is held to a higher standard and expectation than any other power-producing industry.  And the workers – the operators, engineers, technicians, scientists – that are employed at those plants and research labs know the power radiation possesses and they respect it.  In comparison, hundreds of miners still die yearly in coal mining related accidents.  Oil spills still occur for the same reasons fairly regularly.  Nuclear power is actually the safest and cleanest mass energy source we have, but we don’t use it because people have an unreasonable (yes, unreasonable) fear of it because they don’t understand it.

image

Further Reading (for those who wish to further educate themselves):

image

tl;dr: Nuclear energy is one of the safest industries in the world.  Reactors are not ticking time bombs.  Sometimes bad shit happens, but it happens a hell of a lot more in other energy producing industries.  Educate yourself with the above links under “Further Readings”.  The Elephant’s Foot, though really effing cool only weighs 2 metric tons, not 1200 tons.

How to Write Combat

writing-the-words:

Writing any fight or combat scene can be tricky. There is a lot to think about while a battle is going on between your characters. Here are some tips about what to focus on while you write your fight scenes. 

image

Make it Matter

Fighting just for the sake of fighting is not going to be good. A fight cannot just be thrown in to increase the word count. It has to mean something, and it has to matter. Looking at Harry Potter, the fight scenes always advance the plot. In the Deathly Hallows, fights happen frequently. The group leaves the Dursley house to be immediately attacked once they’re in the air. This tells the group that someone had been giving Voldemort information, and that’s why the Dark Lord knew Harry would be moved that night. The Death Eaters showing up in the cafe after the Trio escapes the Burrow. This forces the Trio to go to Grimmauld Place because they need somewhere safe to hide. The fight at the Ministry of Magic leads to Yaxley findng Grimmauld Place, forcing the Trio to move their hide out. All of these fights matter and advance the plot in the story. 

image

Secondly, it has to actually matter to the reader. Any fight is far less interesting with nothing at stake to the characters. Every combat scene has to have the character risk something. What happens if they lose? Will they die? Will their family or friends die? Will the treasure they were ordered to guard be stolen? With their prisoners escape? This also ties in with having flawed characters. It’s not fun to watch Superman fight because it’s very unlikely Superman will even get hurt, and even more unlikely that he’ll actually lose. 

Be Different 

image

Having a character preform the same heroic action over and over again throughout the book is going to get boring for the reader. Look to Rick Riordan’s Percy Jackson series. Percy fights with water and his sword. Annabeth has her knife. Sometimes they’re joined by Grover or Tyson or Clarisse. Every fight scene isn’t just Percy Jackson swinging his sword around chopping his opponents to bits. Regardless of the weapon being used, characters also get creative. Fighting Medusa had to be done through a reflection, for example. Things have to change. 

If you have a character who only fights in one way, that’s okay too. It’s then very important that you learn to vary your descriptions. Keep that style of fighting interesting so your reader stays with you. 

Structure and Wording

image

This is probably the trickiest part of writing a fight scene: actually writing it. Over writing will be a problem. Any wordiness that slows the reader down is going to also slow down the fight itself. Most fights aren’t slow, and you will want to match the pace of your scene.

Keep your sentences short to make the fight move fast.

Pick and choose your verbs carefully and make them good ones. Cut out adverbs, they’ll only hurt you. When using descriptions, make sure they are sensory descriptions. You can set up the scene before the fight starts. Use that time to set the stage and describe the cliffs they’re on or the lake behind them. Once the fight starts, limit your description to what the character feels or hears, or even tastes. Can he feel the wound in his arm? Maybe she hears the sleeve of her jacket rip? The taste of blood in their mouth after a particularly hard hit. These are things that will add to the fight. 

Getting Started 

image

If you’re having some trouble getting the fight going, just try to get everything down. Picture the fight in your head, and start writing it. Forget about sentence sizes, verbs, and details. Write it all. You can always edit the scene later to improve the structure and word choices. Obsessing over every line as you write will only leave you with a blank paper. 

Best of luck! 
Marina Montenegro 

justinoaksford:

Notes for an Anon who asks, 

“ Hey Justin, thanks for your reply earlier. Just wanted to expand on my previous ask – do you have any tips for achieving colour harmony across an entire painting? I often feel like the objects in my paintings look disjointed, like I haven’t chosen the ‘right’ brown for trees or the ‘right’ green for grass when I use opaque brushes, this isn’t so much of an issue when I’m painting a single object or character but when painting an entire scene I find it very difficult to tie everything together. “

btw, this is COMPLETELY UNACADEMIC- I mean, parts may be “academic” but this is not meant to be a textbook. Terms are used VERY CASUALLY and the information is not at all comprehensive. This is an extremely brief superficial look at the term “Color Harmony”.

If you want ACTUAL color education, either take Sam Nielsen’s Schoolism class, or get James Gurney’s Color and Light book, or do both!!!!!

That said, I hope it helps some folks!

faun-songs:

i tried to make a tut on how i draw bodies but it came out as a mix between me trying to make sense of my lazy technique and general art tips??

i get overwhelmed by complex scheming and sketching so i try to sketch with the least lines/shapes possible.

if you find this method too difficult-dont worry. ive had years of practice and ive developed a lot of shortcuts for myself, so this might be like reading the notes of a student who has their unique set of abbreviations.

hope that helps tho??