we all write essays that need sources like 5 seconds before itâs due so here is my #1 tip that i havenât been called out for yet in my 3 years of collegeÂ
writing a paper on alexander the great but couldnât be bothered to look at more than the wikipedia page? WELLÂ
GO to the wikipedia page and find a fact that youâd like to incorporateâŚ
coooool honor and glory so Manly⢠ANYWAYSÂ
see that little circled 169? click it and itâll take you HERE:Â
so with this one youâll get not one, but two sources. that GIVE YOU PAGE NUMBERS. mla in-text citations? done. just paraphrase the fact, and add ââŚâ(Green 5).Â
but we need the full thing, donât we? go here by clicking on the hyperlink –
and thatâs all the info you need! now google to find the exact book and more up-to-date accurate info you need for your works cited and, maybe, find a pdf online or a copy in your library.Â
BUT THATâS NOT ALL. for this example it doesnât work, because the page this specific fact is on is not available in the way iâm gonna show you, but oh well.Â
you couldâve clicked on âRoisman and Worthington 2010, p. 190,â whichâll take you here:Â
scroll down aaaaaandÂ
see those blue links? those are available chapters of the book! for free! right at your fingertips! no need to get up and run to your library, or stress out that you canât find the book online. google books has TONS of resources.
at the bottom of a wikipedia article, the sources are categorized into primary and secondary sources as well, in case you need to fill a specific source type requirement.Â
you can do this with anything. iâve done it with audrey hepburn (my school library had no books/articles of use), world war ii, the hebrews in the old testamentâŚliterally, anything. as a disclaimer, this probs isnât 100% foolproof, but none of my professors have caught on. and in a pinch, it works better than scanning an entire book or article for a fact you need. Â
Oh my god, they sprang this on us in our old church years ago, and my family has never let this joke die.
Okay, hereâs the stupid gender essentialist metaphor:
Women are like spaghetti because their thoughts noodle all over the place. Men are like waffles because there thoughts are in boxes. Men arenât bad listeners, they just canât keep up with a conversation when women are noodling topics so fast and they have to keep switching boxes. Also, when a woman asks a man what heâs thinking and he says ânothingâ women just donât understand that some of a manâs boxes literally have nothing in them, haha!
âŚ.. đ
Anyway, if you think me and my brothers and my mom donât constantly give each other sad, tragic faces and say âIâm sorry, my waffle box is empty todayâ and ânoodle faster!â and âyou are failing at being a waffleâ and âI canât be clearer, I am a plate of spaghettiâ pretty much indiscriminately in all directions all the timeâŚ. you would be wrong.
Occasionally the context of a Dadaist post makes it even better.
If children of color have to be aware of the realities of racism, white children should too.
Iâm tired of hearing that white children are too young to understand the consequence of their words or actions when for nonwhite kids they live with the impact of racism every dayÂ
You must be logged in to post a comment.